- What Pass-Rate Data Actually Exists for the ACT Exam
- The 2024 Cohort: 13 of 30 Candidates
- The 2021 Review: Two Passes Among 35 Candidates
- Why There Is No Single 2026 Pass Rate
- How the Exam Format and Scoring Shape Outcomes
- Where the Points Are: Domains and Species
- Registration Mechanics That Affect Your Odds
- Reading the Numbers Like a Candidate
- Frequently Asked Questions
- The ACT's Fall 2024 eNews reports 13 of 30 candidates passing, published as 43%.
- The 2021 Certifying Examination review reports only two passes among 35 candidates.
- Neither result is a current 2026 pass rate; both are dated, cohort-specific outcomes.
- No fixed numeric pass mark is verified; standard setting uses the Modified Angoff method.
What Pass-Rate Data Actually Exists for the ACT Exam
Candidates searching for a "DACT pass rate" usually want one clean number: the percentage of people who pass the Diplomate, American College of Theriogenologists Certifying Examination on a typical sitting. The honest answer is that the American College of Theriogenologists (ACT) does not publish a rolling, annual pass-rate dashboard. What exists is a small number of dated reports describing specific cohorts. This article lays out those data points, explains what each one can and cannot tell you, and shows how the exam's structure helps interpret them.
If you are still orienting yourself to the credential, start with What Is DACT? and What Does DACT Stand For?, then return here. For the difficulty side of the equation, see How Hard Is the DACT Exam? Complete Difficulty Guide 2026.
The 2024 Cohort: 13 of 30 Candidates
The most recent outcome data comes from the ACT eNews, Fall 2024. It reports that 13 of 30 candidates passed, a result published as 43%. The same report breaks the cohort into two groups that matter for interpretation:
- Multispecies candidates: 13 of 29 passed.
- Legacy equine candidates: zero of one passed.
That second line is easy to misread. 2024 was the final year in which candidates under the 2019-or-earlier General Information Guide (GIG) could select a species-specific examination. The single legacy equine candidate is a transitional artifact, not a trend. Because the lone legacy candidate did not pass, the headline 43% (13 of 30) is slightly lower than the multispecies-only ratio (13 of 29), which works out to roughly 45%. Either way, the point stands: this was a small cohort, and a handful of candidates moves the percentage substantially.
What a 30-candidate cohort can and cannot tell you
With 30 test-takers, one additional pass or failure shifts the published percentage by more than three points. That sensitivity is why a single year should be read as a snapshot rather than a forecast. It also means you should not treat 43% as a promise or a ceiling for your own sitting. The 2024 figure tells you the exam is demanding enough that a substantial share of a motivated, residency-trained cohort did not pass in that year, which is consistent with the rigor described in our difficulty guide.
The 2021 Review: Two Passes Among 35 Candidates
The second dated data point is the Report on Review of the ACT 2021 Certifying Examination, published January 2022. It reports two passes among 35 candidates. That is a strikingly low outcome, and it is the reason this report is frequently cited when candidates discuss how unforgiving the exam can be.
Put the two reports side by side and the lesson is variability. A 2021 cohort with two passes among 35 and a 2024 cohort with 13 passes among 30 are very far apart. Whatever changed between those sittings, whether candidate preparation, examination design, standard-setting practice or the mix of candidates, the pass outcome moved a great deal. That volatility is itself the most important finding.
| Source | Cohort | Reported outcome | Limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACT eNews, Fall 2024 | 30 candidates | 13 passed, published as 43% | Includes 13 of 29 multispecies and 0 of 1 legacy equine; final year of species-specific option for pre-2019-GIG candidates |
| Report on Review of the ACT 2021 Certifying Examination (Jan 2022) | 35 candidates | 2 passed | Historical; content allocations in the review are not the current blueprint |
Why There Is No Single 2026 Pass Rate
It would be convenient to write "the DACT pass rate in 2026 is X%." Doing so would be inventing a number. Several facts prevent a defensible 2026 figure:
- No current published rate. The ACT's public pages and the documents retrieved for this article contain no verified, current-year pass-rate statement.
- Tiny cohorts. The Certifying Examination is taken by a few dozen candidates at a time, so any percentage is statistically fragile.
- No verified fixed pass mark. The passing standard is set through a Modified Angoff process rather than a published universal cutoff, which is discussed below and in DACT Passing Score 2026: Exactly What You Need to Pass.
- Documents that could not be confirmed. The ACT's index advertises a 2026 General Information Guide and an ACT Job Task Analysis 2023, but those downloads could not be retrieved for verification here. The September 2025 guide does not establish what the 2026 edition says.
The next examination dates announced on the ACT Requirements page are July 13-14, 2027, so a fresh outcome report for that sitting is not yet available. For scheduling details, see DACT Exam Dates 2026: Testing Windows, Deadlines & Scheduling.
How the Exam Format and Scoring Shape Outcomes
Pass rates are downstream of format. The ACT Certifying Examination is electronic, web-based and described on the current exam page as remote and conducted over two days. The Certifying Examination Committee prepares and administers it. Its three components add up to 500 points:
| Component | Items | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple-choice questions | 100 | 200 |
| Essay questions | 20 | 200 |
| Practical image/video short-answer questions | 45-50 | 100 |
| Total | 500 |
Why the essay weight matters for pass outcomes
Essays carry as many points as the entire multiple-choice section: 200 points for 20 questions. A candidate who is strong at recognition but weak at composing a complete, organized clinical answer can lose a large share of the available points. Each essay and practical response is scored by two graders against rubrics, which rewards answers that hit the specific elements a rubric expects: differential diagnoses, diagnostic steps, treatment options, prognosis and client-management points.
The standard-setting process
A psychometrician supports an independent Angoff Scoring Committee, and the retrieved guide specifies Modified Angoff standard setting. In plain terms, qualified experts judge how a minimally competent candidate would perform on the questions, and those judgments inform where the passing standard sits. This is why no fixed numeric pass mark is verified: the standard comes out of a defined method rather than a flat percentage you can aim for in advance. The practical consequence is that you cannot reverse-engineer a safe score target from a pass rate, which is covered further in our passing-score article.
Key Takeaway
Because the standard is set by Modified Angoff rather than a published cutoff, the right preparation goal is broad, defensible competence across all three formats, not a target percentage on any one section.
Where the Points Are: Domains and Species
Understanding where the exam draws its content helps explain why candidates fall short. The blueprint has two independent axes. Knowledge-content percentages and species percentages classify the same examination in different ways and must not be added together.
Knowledge-content axis
The listed knowledge areas and their official weights total 100%. (The accompanying prose on the ACT page mentions 16 knowledge domains, which conflicts with the eleven listed headings; this article uses the eleven displayed lines.)
| Domain | Weight |
|---|---|
| Non-pregnant female anatomy, physiology, and clinical reproduction | 18% |
| Clinical approach to the pregnant and postpartum female | 16% |
| Male anatomy, physiology, and clinical reproduction | 14% |
| Pregnancy | 11% |
| Artificial insemination | 9% |
| Breeding management and population control | 8% |
| Embryo technologies | 6% |
| Urogenital surgery | 6% |
| Neonatology | 5% |
| Fertilization, embryology, and sexual differentiation | 4% |
| Pharmacology | 3% |
The top three areas (non-pregnant female at 18%, the pregnant and postpartum female at 16%, and male reproduction at 14%) account for the bulk of the content. For a deeper walk-through of each area, see DACT Exam Domains 2026: Complete Guide to All 11 Content Areas.
Species axis
The separate species blueprint is where the multispecies design becomes concrete: Equine 35%, Canine 25%, Bovine 20%, Caprine/ovine 6%, Feline 4%, General, non-species specific 6%, Swine 2%, and New world camelids 2%. The issuer explicitly distinguishes the general category from the other species. A candidate whose residency was heavily canine, for example, still faces a blueprint in which equine content is the single largest species block and bovine is larger than all small ruminant, feline, swine and camelid content combined.
Where multispecies gaps hurt most
Because the exam is comparative and multispecies, a weak species is not a niche weakness; it is exposure across several domains at once.
- Equine (35%) and canine (25%) together make up well over half the species axis.
- Bovine (20%) is large enough that a purely companion-animal or purely equine background leaves a serious hole.
- Small ruminants, feline, swine and camelids are individually small but collectively meaningful, and are easy to under-study.
One structural note ties back to the 2024 data: the multispecies examination is now the standard path, and the species-specific option for pre-2019-GIG candidates ended after 2024. Candidates in earlier years could narrow their scope; current candidates cannot.
Registration Mechanics That Affect Your Odds
Pass outcomes depend on who reaches the exam room prepared, and the pathway filters candidates well before test day. The relevant mechanics from the ACT's published materials:
- Examination fee: the official Exam Fee listing is USD 750. The separate one-time training-program registration charge is USD 250. A fuller breakdown is in DACT Certification Cost 2026: Complete Pricing Breakdown.
- Eligibility: an AVMA-accredited veterinary degree (or accepted ECFVG/PAVE certification or qualifying legal authorization to practise), professional standing, approved training and a credentials review. Details are in DACT Requirements 2026: Eligibility, Prerequisites & How to Qualify.
- Residency route: at least one year of clinical practice or internship followed by 104 weeks of approved residency training.
- Deadlines: current portal and index deadlines are November 30 for annual trainee reports, December 1 for credentials, and April 15 for examination registration, with alternate and graduate route registration requests due January 31. The September 2025 guide instead gives November 30 for credentials in section F.1.b, a conflict that remains unresolved; the current issuer index explicitly sets December 1, 2026 for applications to the 2027 examination. Verify with the ACT before relying on either date.
- Publication timing: the retrieved guide permits examination before proof of the first-author peer-reviewed publication, but the Diplomate certificate is withheld until that requirement is met.
Because candidates arrive only after a multi-year training program with case records, a clinical skills assessment, a teaching presentation, 30 hours of relevant CE and references from two ACT Diplomates, the pool sitting the exam is already highly selected. A pass rate in the neighborhood of the 2024 result among such a pool says something about how demanding the exam is relative to an already-qualified group. Training pathways are described further in DACT Training.
Reading the Numbers Like a Candidate
The sensible way to use the pass-rate data is as a calibration tool, not a prediction. Three practical conclusions follow from the available evidence.
Plan for the hardest format first
Essays and practical image/video items together are worth 300 of 500 points. If your preparation leans on multiple-choice recognition, the point distribution works against you. Build the habit of writing structured answers early, and practice interpreting images and video the way the practical section will present them.
Schedule by weight, then repair species gaps
One short, DACT-specific way to sequence preparation: begin with the three heaviest knowledge areas, then move to the mid-weight reproduction and breeding domains, and reserve a block for the small domains (neonatology, embryology, pharmacology) that are easy to neglect. Layer species coverage across the whole plan so equine, canine and bovine receive proportionally more time than camelids or swine. The ACT Study Guide, updated April 2022, offers a suggested, unweighted preparation curriculum and reading guidance; it does not establish exhaustive examination coverage or an official domain count, so use it alongside the blueprint rather than instead of it. For a full preparation framework, read DACT Study Guide 2026: How to Pass on Your First Attempt, and keep DACT Cheat Sheet 2026: One-Page Review of Must-Know Facts handy for last-pass review.
Test yourself against realistic questions
Pass-rate numbers cannot tell you whether you personally are ready. Timed practice can. Working through question sets on the DACT Exam Prep practice test site lets you find weak domains before the real sitting, and the main practice test is a low-cost way to check whether your recall holds across species rather than only in your strongest one.
Frequently Asked Questions
There is no verified 2026 pass rate. The most recent published result is from the ACT eNews, Fall 2024, which reports 13 of 30 candidates passing, published as 43%. That is a dated cohort result, not a current estimate.
The Report on Review of the ACT 2021 Certifying Examination, published January 2022, reports two passes among 35 candidates. The reasons are discussed in that report and relate to the 2021 examination cycle; its content allocations should not be treated as the current blueprint.
No. It describes one 30-candidate cohort. That cohort included 13 of 29 multispecies candidates and zero of one legacy equine candidate, and 2024 was the last year pre-2019-GIG candidates could choose a species-specific exam.
No fixed numeric pass mark is verified. The exam totals 500 points, and the retrieved guide specifies Modified Angoff standard setting supported by a psychometrician and an independent Angoff Scoring Committee. See the DACT passing score article for more.
The ACT Requirements page announces July 13-14, 2027 as the next examination dates. The current issuer index sets December 1, 2026 for applications to the 2027 examination. Confirm all deadlines directly with the ACT.